The Baylor Health Care System recently announced that they will no longer hire smokers, beginning next year. Citing rising health costs, all prospective employees will be subjected to a nicotine scan with their hiring contingent on a clean test result. The issue raises some interesting questions, and we’d like to know what you think about it! Take a look at both sides of the issue, and then join our debate in the comments section.
Baylor’s smoking gun
There is strong data that supports Baylor’s decision. Smoking related health problems are estimated to cost American employers upwards of $200 billion dollars each year, according to the FDA. Furthermore, tobacco-using employees statistically have lower productivity levels, take more sick days, and of course, have higher insurance rates. And as we’ve mentioned in previous blogs, employers have a vested interest in employee health. There is definitely compelling evidence that removing tobacco from your workforce has significant economic benefits.
Cost reduction vs. privacy rights
Not everyone agrees with Baylor’s decision, however. The ban raises important ethical questions about the acceptable level of employer influence in employees’ private lives. If employers can ban smoking altogether, some experts say they could logically ban other risky behaviors such as motorcycling, eating fast food, and even sex. Legal issues also come into play. Though smoking bans are legal in Texas, most states outlaw such employer bans.
Critics also cite alternative techniques for limiting tobacco’s negative effects on the workplace. Many companies choose to ban smoking on their campuses or give extra incentives for non-smokers. Additionally, a provision in last year’s Health Care Reform Law provides another new way to save businesses money and discourage smoking by allowing employers to impose “a health insurance surcharge of up to 50 percent against employees who smoke.”
What do you think?
We’d like to know where you stand in this debate. Do the negative health and economics effects of smoking warrant a strong, employer-driven crack down? Or is such a move an overreach of employer control? Tell us what you think!
Image used under Creative Commons from corscri.


